- February 28, 2017
- Posted by: Sage Shield Safety Consultants
- Category: Global Safety News
There has been a significant shift in the way farmers view health and safety since the roll out of the farm health and safety rules a year ago said Federated Farmers South Canterbury chairman Mark Adams.
Farmers were “engaged” and having conversations about health and safety that they didn’t have before, he said.
They were more aware of the importance of health and safety than they were two years ago.
“The are a lot of incidences where farming couples are involved. Couples are addressing the issue as a team.
“Firstly, this brings in a female perspective. And secondly, the work is shared. It’s all hands to the pump, so to speak.
“Worksafe is trying to drive a culture change – that near-misses should be taken seriously,” he said.
Farm deaths are down but it’s too early to tell if new health and safety laws have made a lasting trend, says Work Safe New Zealand.
The laws have been in place for a year, and although farm fatalities over the past year were not as high as recent years, it’s too short a period to call a trend, Work Safe New Zealand agricultural sector leader Al McCone said
“But our target is to drop deaths and injuries by 25 per cent the next few years.”
McCone said there was a “fair amount of consternation” among farmers about their new responsibilities and paperwork generated by the rules. Overall, their introduction did not have the “catastrophic effect” a lot of farmers imagined it would, he said. Rather, it had raised awareness of the need for improving farmer safety in the workplace.
“The good thing about the new legislation is that it has raised everyone’s awareness and we have been able to build on that and start educating on what appropriate health and safety for a farm looks like.”
McCone said one of the interesting things that had come out from the new law was the concept of why farmers farm.
“They farm because it gives them independence of decision making. It’s not a lifestyle, it’s a way of life. I’m in charge, I determine my workplace, how I do my pasture. I have that independence.”
When it comes to regulations farmers automatically looked to see if it was going to interfere with their ability to operate in the way they felt comfortable,” he said.
Adams said where farmers are anti is when they can’t see how to make a rule work. For instance taking a passenger on a four-wheeler.
“A farmer will believe he has the right to assess the risk if he drives slowly. They generally embrace a rule if they can see how it will work for them.”
“What we are trying to say is this isn’t about ruining how farmers operate their farms,” McCone said.
“We aren’t here to tell them how to farm but provide them with a sense of what’s good practice in health and safety.
“It’s important to realise that this isn’t just about regulations in health and safety, it’s about running a successful business. Because what underlines good health and safety management are the same things that underlay good business practice.
“For instance having a strategic approach so you are not just going day by day but planning well out for a whole range of things. For instance, if you are planning on doing some fencing, it doesn’t add much more workload to make sure injuries don’t occur.”
McCone said he was not convinced that Kiwi farmers were good at engaging their staff, especially in the dairy industry. A lot of workers did not feel they were a valued part of the farm, he said. They feel their opinion does not matter, that they are there to do what they are told, and when they have had enough they will go and work elsewhere.
There is a “whole lot” of business advantages for farmers to engage with their staff. If you give staff latitude to express their opinion, the business will benefit, he said.
“If you have good business practice and a strategic approach, engage staff and have good maintenance schedules – these things will drop your injury rate.”